![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
IOCCP
Workshop Table of Contents Introduction
to the Workshop Introduction
to the Workshop Science Overview Presentations
|
|||||||||||||
|
Repeat Section Presentations
|
Underway
Measurements
Underway Measurements Presentations
|
||||||||||||
|
Atlantic Maps and Tables (html) Indian Maps and Tables (html) Pacific Maps and Tables (html) |
Underway Measurements Compilations (with time series stations) Atlantic Maps and Tables (html) Indian Maps and Tables (html) Pacific Maps and Tables (html)
|
||||||||||||
|
Global
Maps of VOS and Repeat Sections (see IOCCP ObsNet for most recent
version).
|
|||||||||||||
|
Repeat Section Working Group Reports
WGI Summary Report (pdf 200KB) |
Underway Working Group Reports
WGII Summary Report (pdf 155KB) |
||||||||||||
|
International Ocean Carbon Coordination Project Workshop Summary (pdf 90KB) Objectives for the International Ocean Carbon Coordination Project (A Joint Pilot Activity of the SCOR-IOC Advisory Panel on Ocean CO2 and the Global Carbon Project) 1. Develop a compilation and synthesis of large-scale ocean carbon observation activities and plans. 2. Promote the full integration of large-scale carbon studies into the planning activities of international research programs (e.g., CLIVAR, OCEANS, SOLAS) 3. Identify and coordinate regional-scale science groups (e.g., PICES WG17, CARINA) to critically examine the scientific balance, quality and completeness of these programs with reference to global-scale research needs. Promote the establishment of other regional groups as needed. 4. Organize international groups to promote acceptance of:
Specific Action Items from this Workshop: The IOCCP should develop a web site to disseminate information on national plans for large-scale carbon observations and progress on objectives listed above. Action 1: Hood, Sabine, Wallace, Canadell, Foster, and Hill to develop site through IOC and GCP in collaboration with CLIVAR. The IOCCP should serve as a focal point for communication between the carbon community and CLIVAR to identify key areas of common interest and promote a stronger collaboration in developing a measurement strategy for carbon and tracers on repeat hydrographic sections. Action 2: Hood, Tilbrook, Sabine, and Feely to develop a statement to the CLIVAR community about the need for tracer measurements on specific repeat sections, promote the appointment of carbon representatives to the CLIVAR regional panels, and establish a closer dialogue with CLIVAR planning of repeat section work in each basin. The IOCCP should establish formal links with PICES WG17 and CARINA to encourage these regional programs to evaluate the scientific balance, quality and completeness of the large-scale carbon programs with reference to global-scale research needs and facilitate the organization of training workshops and inter-laboratory comparisons to improve data quality. Action 3: Hood, Sabine, Dickson, Mintrop to establish mechanism for IOCCP to provide global coordination to regional groups. The IOCCP should facilitate closer links (possibly through interdisciplinary workshops) between the ocean and atmospheric carbon observation communities and the modelling community. Action 4: Hood, Canadell, Feely, Gnanadesikan, and Heinze to document on-going ocean carbon modelling projects and groups, and begin a dialogue with appropriate key scientists to outline the needs for a workshop. The IOCCP should promote the public release of large-scale carbon data sets within 2 years of cruise completion and encourage submission of international repeat hydrographic section data with carbon measurements to CDIAC and to GHDO. Action 5: Kozyr, Swift, and Hill to provide a plan for coordinated data submission of carbon and tracer data on CLIVAR repeat hydrographic sections. The IOCCP should facilitate the revision and expansion of the DOE CO2 Methods Handbook (lead by A. Dickson) and promote it as a manual of best practices to be followed by those participating in the large-scale carbon observation network. Action 6: Hood and Dickson to develop a plan to finalize the revision, possible translation into other languages, and to promote and distribute the handbook. The IOCCP should work with appropriate organizations and scientific groups to develop a policy for the proper citation of large-scale data sets. Action 7: Hood, Sabine, Feely, and Wallace to encourage data centers to clearly indicate appropriate reference/acknowledgement for data being downloaded and to contact the American Geophysical Union, the European Geophysical Union, and other appropriate groups to initiate discussions on policies for acknowledging the use of large-scale data sets in peer-reviewed articles. The IOCCP should coordinate and promote the compilation and public release of historical pCO2 data sets. Action 8: Dickson, Kozyr, and Heinze to develop a brief position paper outlining this high priority for the community and a plan for coordination between on-going efforts at CDIAC, WDC-MARE / ORFOIS, and other programs. The IOCCP should address the problem of excessive delays in obtaining permission from governments to make pCO2 measurements on ships of opportunity in territorial waters. Action 9: Hood, Manabe, Tilbrook, Zika, Feely, and Nojiri to document particular problems faced with the current system and work with the IOC-WMO JCOMM Ship Observations Team to find the best way forward. The IOCCP should support and promote certified reference material programs, including the development of appropriate standard gases for ocean carbon work. Action 10: Hood, Dickson, and Nojiri to work with the atmospheric community (Roger Francey) to develop a round-robin intercomparison test for ocean carbon gases.
Web-site Features:
Resources and Project Feasibility Issues: The Participants noted that, given the number of different organizations to be contacted, coordinated with, and linked to, an international coordination project must have one central focal point. It was remarked that the roles for this coordination project outlined here are not new - they have been discussed for 20 years or more. The Participants stressed that the reason these coordination activities have never been accomplished is because there has never been a central focal point or sufficient secretariat support to adequately establish such a program. The Participants also stressed that because there is interest and pressure to develop an ocean carbon observing capability and research strategy for ocean carbon assessment and projection, the ocean carbon community must have its own international coordination program rather than trying to coordinate its activities via individual scientists participating in interdisciplinary programs. The Participants strongly urged the IOC, SCOR, and the GCP to undertake seriously this initiative to develop an international ocean carbon coordination project, taking into account previous failures at similar attempts, and further urged that these sponsor organizations recognize and support the critical need for adequate secretariat support for such an endeavour. The Participants noted with appreciation the value of the close association with the IOC, particularly in matters of developing and gaining international acceptance of standards, the development of international data exchange agreements, and issues of conducting marine scientific research in territorial waters.
|
|||||||||||||